Feckless or reckless?
A writer named Paul Pillar described Jeremy Corbyn as a "feckless left-winger", and a lot of people think that Boris Johnson is too reckless to be Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. I just realized that "feckless" and "reckless" are different and the difference is just one letter. While I feel that Boris Johnson is a reckless person, I don't know if Jeremy Corbyn is feckless or not. I am interested in the context where the two words are used. Which word is more favored by those who want to criticize their antagonists? To you, which word causes more damage?
I prefer to be called "feckless" rather than to be called "reckless".
「b. 社会」カテゴリの記事
- 福岡参院選データが示す静かな地殻変動(音声とグラフによる解説)(2025.12.04)
- 「高齢層と若者」というとらえ方の問題点を示唆するグラフ(2025.10.31)
- グローバリズムとグローバリゼーション (2025.10.08)
- 「社会的自由」という言葉があるらしい。(2025.10.07)
- 政治軸・経済軸・文化軸の3次元の分類 (2025.10.03)